tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-264357587536939736.post5203082613377374908..comments2023-07-13T14:24:43.135+02:00Comments on The Devil's Honey: Quack! Quack! Quack?Mahoniehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10472740483322899267noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-264357587536939736.post-21948314552391347202007-09-18T13:48:00.000+02:002007-09-18T13:48:00.000+02:00I would'nt read too much much into fellas! Lucio d...I would'nt read too much much into fellas! Lucio does'nt know the meaning of the word 'subtle' if he was the killer Lucio would have shoved it our faces.The-Iron-Inspectorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00046658355435277292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-264357587536939736.post-35297369294792246822007-07-22T21:59:00.000+02:002007-07-22T21:59:00.000+02:00As I understand it, this is something which is in ...As I understand it, this is something which is in the Anchor Bay DVD but not the newer Another World one or the original version of the film. <BR/><BR/>In the latter two, the scene functions to throws suspicion on Dr Davis, that he could be the ripper, whereas in the Anchor Bay it comes across as a coda / comment on all that has preceded it.K H Brownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12032330558218087354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-264357587536939736.post-34810577212231361092007-07-12T21:53:00.000+02:002007-07-12T21:53:00.000+02:00Hey James,Thanks for pointing out the imdb message...Hey James,<BR/>Thanks for pointing out the imdb message boards, that's actually a source I never check out. <BR/><BR/>Hi Anonymous, <BR/>Well that might be true, but for me that's not really all that important. A film should stand on its own, the filmmakers "explanation" or (non-)intentions should already be in the film for the viewer to discover and interpret, not be given before or after...<BR/><BR/>Hey Crystal,<BR/>Nice link, thanks. I love those DVD comparisons they do. But why do they call that "extraneous shot" a discrapancy and not the absens of it on the other DVD. If I understand correctly, no version of this film has that peticular scene at the "correct" place, so I guess it does belong at the end...Mahoniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10472740483322899267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-264357587536939736.post-49420343360651235932007-07-12T12:49:00.000+02:002007-07-12T12:49:00.000+02:00I was under the impression that it was actually a ...I was under the impression that it was actually a problem of the AB DVD (with other releasee using the same print) and that the newer releases by ie. AWE are corrected,with the scene in place.<BR/>Read this:<BR/><BR/>http://whiggles.landofwhimsy.com/writings/dvdimage-newyorkripper.html<BR/><BR/><I>"A further discrepancy shows up in the form of an extraneous shot of Dr. Davis that, on the French disc, is for some bizarre reason spliced into the middle of the final scene, breaking the continuity. This shot should have appeared much earlier in the film, at around the 44 minute mark, when he and Williams have left the hospital. On the Australian DVD, it is completely absent."</I>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-264357587536939736.post-58530129420397795912007-07-09T19:43:00.000+02:002007-07-09T19:43:00.000+02:00It's Fulci and therefore most likely just non-sens...It's Fulci and therefore most likely just non-sensical, if it was really meant to imply that he is the true killer Fulci'd have been much more obvious about it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-264357587536939736.post-5150400738081166692007-07-09T15:08:00.000+02:002007-07-09T15:08:00.000+02:00I was also wondering about this. Wether it was jus...I was also wondering about this. Wether it was just Fulci making another nonsense ending or if there really is more to it.<BR/><BR/>There is alot about this on imdb's message board. Many people think that he is the killer and that is implied by the freeze frame at the end.Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13069887214522768042noreply@blogger.com